Customer Reviews

sftwreeng said
This book goes too much detail into intricacies of language syntax while the examples are too basic and confusing. Some times the important syntactical explanations are too vague and confusing while the infrequently used items are explained in too much detail. I have found that Wrox books are doing a much better job with explaining the concepts and their examples are more in depth and easier to understand. However, it does cover most of the .net concepts and some topics like Threads are covered in an extremely helpful manner. I find this book to be boring to read but will keep it as a reference, as overall, it is not a bad book.

Anonymous said
I really wonder how this book deserved 5 stars from some readers.
Most topics are explained poorly, or sometimes even not explained at all!!! (I started thinking that autor himself need to learn the language). Second, to explain even a trivial thing, the autor presents loooooong codes, what really wastes time, because you always have figure out, which part part of code is really dedicated to explain the point, what sometimes makes me tired before I understand something. Also, in the most of the code examples suddenly there appear something new, something specific to C#, and autor even does not say a word about that. Because of that, since the autor has tendency to use a long code, and on the other hand has a tendency to explain trough examples, this non-explanation makes the book really impossible to understand, not reading several other books.
Who ever is thinking to buy this book please believe me, it is not the first book to read on C#. May be you will understand easily first few chapters having some programming background, but you will have much trouble understanding more advanced topics, specific to C#.
I am giving this book three stars because it is better then some other books, like for example sams c# complete...

s.perkins@lanl.gov said
This book provides a good introduction to basic C# programming. The 4th edition covers C# / .NET 2.0 which introduces many new features compared to 1.x (e.g. generics), and which is the standard platform for Visual Studio 2005 developers. If you're a Visual Studio .NET 2003 developer, you'll need to upgrade (or download a beta version) in order to run some of the examples. This is a book about the C# language rather than .NET, so reading this book will not turn you into a proficient Windows/Web Forms programmer. However, it provides an essential foundation for further reading on more advanced .NET topics. Jesse Liberty writes in a fairly readable style, and I particularly liked the small sections contrasting the way C# does something with similar techniques in C++, Visual Basic and Java. Some of the code examples feel a bit verbose: several times the same long listing appears in full with minor changes between each version. The organization of the book also felt a little quirky, with important topics like streams and threads relegated to the back of the book, appearing after much more obscure discussions of marshalling and remoting. In general though, a good introduction to C# 2.0.

johnjsal said
As you might gather from the title of my review, I'm a little hesitant to call this book an "introduciton" without also qualifying it as a "review." It seems to be a little bit of both in that it discusses all of the basics of the C# language first (data types, methods, etc.) but the complexity quickly escalates into some fairly complicated sample code/programs. What had me a little confused was how, in the middle of explaining a very complicated section of code, Liberty stops to also explain some very elementary points about the language that you should know by this point -- unfortunately I don't have the book with me to give a real example, but just to help you understand what I mean, it's sort of like telling someone all the in-depth and complicated details of how a database program works, and then you suddenly stop and say "Oh by the way, when you refer to a method, you need to put the class name in front of it with the dot operator" (this is something that you can't possibly have missed if you've gotten as far as DB programming!) This made it hard for me to finally determine who exactly this book is written for.

In my opinion, it's a good intro (until you get to the more complicated sections later), but you might benefit from reading something else first. I hate to sound like a broken record, but Charles Petzold's Programming in the Key of C# is an excellent foundation from which to progress. Liberty's book is the second I read after Petzold, and I know Petzold's book helped me understand this one more than I probably would have. (Liberty also has Learning C#, which is much more of an intro, but I believe it contains a lot of the same information as the first few parts of this book).

Anyway, so why did I give it 5 stars then? Here are a few reasons:

- A nice introduction to all the basic C# elements
- A section on database programming
- A section on web programming
- A discussion of the new features found in C# 2.0
- A lot of advanced topics toward the end of the book (assemblies, attributes, threads, working with COM, etc.)

In short, it seems to have just about everything you'd want to know about C# (not exhaustively, of course) and I recommend it.

Anonymous said
Well this being my first time working with C# I found the book to give a good general background, and then moving on to some of the more specific semantics of the language. Though the book only teaches how to write for Console apps, the syntax you learn is still necessary for when you move on to windows apps. .NET was described nicely and I learned quickly how to work with the platform. The tips it gave to programmers of other languages were very helpful, as I also program in C++, and it helped me to avoid errors that I would probably overlook otherwise