December 10, 2004Is downloadable music the end for high end audio?Posted 1453 days ago on December 10, 2004Let me put together a few thoughts. First, it's obvious that the future delivery mechanism for audio is the Internet. It's also obvious that the norm will be lossy compression, which flies in the face of efforts to maintain audio quality without any compromise. That strikes me as a sad reversal for hi-fi enthusiasts. Maybe there will be an option for lossless audio files, but that seems far from certain. I realise CDs will be around for a while yet. However, the other day I saw an ad from someone putting up their entire CD collection for sale. "It's the digital era", he explained - CDs are digital too, but I assume he'd transferred them all to a hard disk somewhere and was thinking of that. If this catches on, we could see CD values nosedive in the same way as 2nd hand vinyl. Yes, the sleeves are nice, but that didn't save the LP and it won't save the CD either. I don't mind how the music is delivered, as long as it doesn't carry a lock-in DRM such as Apple provides. I think the industry will sort out the DRM problem at some point, and adopt an open standard. But I do care about sound quality. Someone will say: "But you can't hear the difference in lossy compression, so why does it matter?" It's a good point; but I worry about adding an unecessary dependence on those compression algorithms. Can we be sure that all kinds of music will retain all the subtle nuances that distinguish great recordings? Re: Is downloadable music the end for high end audio?Posted 1453 days ago by Tim Anderson • • • Reply
Kyle, Re: Is downloadable music the end for high end audio?Posted 1449 days ago by Paul Morriss • • www • Reply
www.magnatune.com offer high quality downloads. Re: Is downloadable music the end for high end audio?Posted 1451 days ago by Paul Morriss • • www • ReplyI know that lossy audio isn't as good as lossless, but I don't want to be able to tell the difference. If I did then I'd be thinking, "I wish I had the lossless version of this track, and actually my speakers aren't too great, and I could do with a new amp and...". Therein lies great expense! Re: Is downloadable music the end for high end audio?Posted 1426 days ago by unbrand • • www • Reply
I'm a big believer in lossless audio and I've ripped all my cd's which I stream via iTunes and Airport Express to my stereo. Works great! Legal, online distribution of music to me is tricky, for the good reasons others have noted. I would definitely pay extra for lossless, BUT, the bigger issue is metered web usage such as in New Zealand. No way in hell will I pay to download a lossless CD. It would chew up my daily data budget for 1 CD alone! |
Recent postsUsers plead with Borland to give up .NETIE7 to be released 18th October,... If Microsoft doesn't use UAC, why... Google's unsettling lack of direction Vista security: now prove it |
Re: Is downloadable music the end for high end audio?
Posted 1453 days ago by Kyle Miller • • • ReplyThe answer to audio quality and the internet is simple. Download music services should offer delivery in formats of the user's choosing at bitrates of the user's choosing. The higher the quality, the more bandwidth consumed, the more you pay. And vice versa.
For instance, I see a track I like, I choose Buy, then maybe RealAudio or WMA Lossless, and then download. Sounds like a web site that already exists.